Suburban Chicago News Classifieds SearchChicago Autos SearchChicago Homes  Jobs Sun-Times Find a Pet Classified Ads

Debating debates

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

BY DAN CAMPANA

With apologies to other newspapers harping on Roland Burris' "Senate Showdown," The Beacon cornered the market on showdowns months ago when it tagged Aurora's upcoming election Mayoral Showdown 2009.

The petitions are filed. The candidates are set. Let the games begin.

Tuesday marked the first round of campaign fun, with Alderman Richard Irvin trotting out the grand request for four debates between now and April 7.

Irvin's move begs several questions.

First, isn't this a no-brainer from a strategic standpoint, and Irvin just got to it first? It's a classic move for a challenger to call for public forums, putting the onus on an incumbent to accept.

As a Congressional candidate, Geneva Mayor Kevin Burns decried the fact his request for debates among Republicans went unanswered. He dropped out a month later, and the GOP folks running in the primary ultimately did several joint public events.

There's no doubt Mayor Tom Weisner, Irvin and Alderman Stephanie Kifowit will get together. How soon, how often and under what circumstances remains to be seen. Kifowit said she'll show up to any scheduled debate, welcoming the chance to get in front of voters. Weisner is more reserved, saying he prefers a "reasonable" number of forums for residents, as well as the faith and business communities. Since he's also busy running the city, Weisner says he has a more limited amount of time for debates.

Second, what's the right number of debates? Irvin sounded weary recently when he recalled how many times mayoral candidates did forums during the 2005 race. The field is smaller and there's no primary in 2009, which helps curtail the need for a gaggle of gatherings.

Irvin requested four. Barack Obama and John McCain held three. We'll see how the campaigns work together on this one, but more than three might be a stretch with about 12 weeks before Election Day.

Third, what should these debates focus on?

Generally speaking, the trio could spend days talking about the economy, open government and what's best for Aurora over the next four years. Debates naturally gravitate toward platitudes and overstatement -- neither of which benefit the few voters who care enough to pay attention.

At this point, it sounds like everyone involved wants this campaign to played on a higher level than 2005. The easiest place for that sentiment to go out the window is during a debate. Legitimate questions die when framed poorly or fashinioned as an attack.

Debates should be about informing voters of the issues, coupled with a candidate's stance. For instance, should residents be sold on a concept without being told what it costs to them as taxpayers? Chances are good that a lot of big picture ideas will be challenged during any forums that do occur.

As I said earlier, let the games begin.

He's No. 1!: Alderman Leroy Keith doesn't like to wait. Need proof? He appears to be the first person in the ENTIRE state to have filed his campaign finance report with the Illinois State Board of Elections. While others recovered from New Year's Eve or prepared for NHL action at Wrigley Field, Keith sent his in at 9:28 a.m. on Jan. 1.

Keith said simply he doesn't like having anything pending. Procrastinating, deadline-based reporters around the world can't relate.

Back to the "Showdown": For your browsing pleasure, take a minute to check out the campaign Web sites for Weisner, Kifowit and Irvin.


0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Debating debates.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.suburbanchicagonews.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/5152

1 Comments

You are back, cool.

That being said, next time Steve Lord wants to write about how Linda Holmes would make a good US senator you might want to check him for a fever.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.