Plainfield police on Thursday made two significant statements about the investigation into the disappearance of Lisa Stebic: 1.) They believe she was a victim of foul play, and 2.) Her husband Craig is now a person of interest in the investigation.
The immediate question on everyone's mind is, "Why now?" What's different today than when Lisa went missing 10 weeks ago? Well, the immediate reaction to Thursday's developments is that police hope that by naming him a person of interest, it will increase pressure on Craig to allow investigators to interview his two children about their mother's disappearance. This was stated by Craig's attorney.
The other question on everyone's mind is, why don't authorities simply subpoena the children to testify? The answer is that investigators want to be able to talk to children in the relaxed setting of the Will County Children's Advocacy Center. The only way to do that is with Craig's consent. If a grand jury issues subpoenas, the children would have to appear in the intimidating setting of a courtroom, before a judge, and authorities want to avoid putting the children through that traumatic experience.
What should Craig do? Should he continue heeding the advice of his attorney and refuse to allow his children to be interviewed in a casual setting, or should he let them talk to his kids?
What should authorities do? Continue holding out and hoping to talk to the kids with their father's permission, or go ahead and order the children to testify before a grand jury?
What should Craig do? Request a press conference where he shouts at the top of his lungs, "I DID IT!!! I DID IT!!! I DID IT!!!" so we can move on to more interesting news.
Someone tell me I'm wrong here. :)
Are his kids safe??? What is taking so long??
I think if he is innocent, then he needs to let the kids talk to the police, Law enforcement will eventually have to do something!!! He needs to confess or let the kids talk. He also needs to get a defense attorney and get rid of his divorce attorney .
Stebic is as dumb as a fox. No body = no conviction.
While I can't blame Lisa Stebic’s family for trying to keep the issue of her disappearance circulating in the media, I do find the fact that the media keeps running segments with no tangible developments to be both unprofessional and unethical. The liberally dominated media does not continue to regurgitate stories about missing children or women when there are no new or few new developments in cases involving minority communities.
So here we have a typical liberal conundrum. While they purport to advance minority causes and issues they ultimately fail to reflect fairness in their propensity to push missing person cases like Lisa Stebic’s over those involving missing minority persons.
Former NBC reporter Amy Jacobson’s bimbosity served to display the lengths some in her field will go to promote stories that they believe are . Jacobson choose to include her children in her appearance at the Stebic residence displaying a complete lack of judgment by placing them in the presence of a man under scrutiny for the disappearance of his wife in order to advance her agenda.
Of course now Jacobson claims that if she were a man in swim trunks he would not have been fired. Jacobson says, “If I were a man, the story wouldn't be an issue”. Again, typical liberal response. Now the moron who placed her children in jeopardy becomes the victim and claims gender bias is the reason for the reaction. Furthermore she claims a competing news station’s choice to air the event was improper when Jacobsen lack of professionalism, class, and judgment on her part became a story in itself.
Only hypocritical liberals are capable of contorting the facts to fit their own agenda while at the same time claiming to be victims.
While I can't blame Lisa Stebic’s family for trying to keep the issue of her disappearance circulating in the media, I do find the fact that the media keeps running segments with no tangible developments to be both unprofessional and unethical. The liberally dominated media does not continue to regurgitate stories about missing children or women when there are no new or few new developments in cases involving minority communities.
So here we have a typical liberal conundrum. While they purport to advance minority causes and issues they ultimately fail to reflect fairness in their propensity to push missing person cases like Lisa Stebic’s over those involving missing minority persons.
Former NBC reporter Amy Jacobson’s bimbosity served to display the lengths some in her field will go to promote stories that they believe are . Jacobson choose to include her children in her appearance at the Stebic residence displaying a complete lack of judgment by placing them in the presence of a man under scrutiny for the disappearance of his wife in order to advance her agenda.
Of course now Jacobson claims that if she were a man in swim trunks he would not have been fired. Jacobson says, “If I were a man, the story wouldn't be an issue”. Again, typical liberal response. Now the moron who placed her children in jeopardy becomes the victim and claims gender bias is the reason for the reaction. Furthermore she claims a competing news station’s choice to air the event was improper when Jacobsen lack of professionalism, class, and judgment on her part became a story in itself.
Only hypocritical liberals are capable of contorting the facts to fit their own agenda while at the same time claiming to be victims.