Won't someone please think of the chickens?! Week 2 featured a warning that the poultry-butchering scene might be too graphic for younger viewers. And the gold star went to ...
Michael. Greg's shoving match with town leader Mike in Week 1 has no doubt doomed his hopes of the $20K prize, so long as Mike's in charge. Next week it looks like Michael gets angry, and gets even.
What did you think--did Michael deserve the reward this week, or did Greg? Did you buy Mike's argument that Greg was only working hard to get the star, and what difference should it make? Does a person's motivation matter, or his results? (The old, `Do the means justify the end?' debate.)
Leave a comment