The Naperville School District 203 board and administration is considering redistricting--or redrawing attendance boundaries for some elementary schools--as a way of avoiding a costly expansion that would be needed to relieve overcrowding at Mill Street Elementary School. Many parents are upset about the plan because their children would have to switch schools. Is redistricting a better solution than expanding Mill Street?
The difficulty with the decision is that one has to weigh the vocal concerns of a smaller number of people who would be most affected (parents whose children would have to switch schools) versus what's better for the greater community. One could argue that redistricting is a better solution for the entire community because it involves substantially less cost. Besides, parents whose kids have had to change schools often say their children adjust well to the change after a relatively short time.
What's the better solution for D203--redistricting, or expanding Mill Street School?
When the School Board can demonstrate the advantages for the students who will be moved from Mill Street, the students at Elmwood who will experience larger classrooms and the students who will remain at Mill Street after redistricting (and STILL have large classrooms), then I will consider supporting the School District's proposed tax increase. Until then, my answer is "no."
Redistricting is a far better option. Not only will it save money, but as a whole, our nation needs to start thinking about creating a lifestyle that is not dependent on single-passenger driving or cars in general. I find it very ironic that the CTA is going to cut over 180 routes and layoff 2400 employees because the state doesn't have the proper funding, yet they have the money to expand highways like mad.
I understand the parents' concern (maybe not completely as I am not a parent myself), but redistricting will save a lot of money. The utilitarian aspect of this argument almost completely outweighs the concerns of the few parents whose children are affected. If they're so concerned, maybe they should present alternative solutions. One idea off the top of my head is to make the section of Mill Street near the school a "carpool only" street (a minimum of 2 passengers per vehicle) during peak traffic times.
From what I understand the redistricting is supposed to save several hundred thousand dollars over the next few years. If that's the case, I'm all for it!
>>Is redistricting a better solution than expanding Mill Street?
Yes.
Does it save money? Go for it!