Your local news source ::
      Select a community or newspaper »

When are the Golden Globes not the Golden Globes? - TV Insider

When are the Golden Globes not the Golden Globes?

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

Sure, it was great to see "Mad Men" win two big awards (and funny to see the Fox TV entertainment reporter say he had never even heard of the show this morning), but Nancy O'Dell and Billy Bush's "banter" made an hour of name announcing too long and painful. I was annoyed this morning when I heard E!'s show was only a half hour, wishing I had tuned in there instead.

Do the Golden Globes, or any award shows, influence what you watch on TV anyway? We've all heard the Hollywood Foreign Press is basically a clique who picks what they like over what is best. So does it even mean anything? Do the Emmys even influence you?

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: When are the Golden Globes not the Golden Globes?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.suburbanchicagonews.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/1516

1 Comments

I watched Golden Globes last night because I heard there would be no audience and I wanted to see what it was like. I know other critics are ripping on it today but I didn't think it was too bad. We still got to see short clips of the nominees and find out who the winners were. I didn't miss the lame jokes, tributes and acceptance speeches one bit. I didn't really like the hosts, so I think the format would work even better with better hosts.

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Wendy Fox Weber published on January 14, 2008 10:48 AM.

What are you watching? was the previous entry in this blog.

More bad news from the writers strike is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Categories

Pages